<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Lego on Nikhil&#39;s blog</title>
    <link>https://master--suspicious-stonebraker-7d2d21.netlify.app/tags/lego/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Lego on Nikhil&#39;s blog</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://master--suspicious-stonebraker-7d2d21.netlify.app/tags/lego/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>If Programming Languages were Lego...</title>
      <link>https://master--suspicious-stonebraker-7d2d21.netlify.app/post/2008/if-programming-languages-were-lego/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://master--suspicious-stonebraker-7d2d21.netlify.app/post/2008/if-programming-languages-were-lego/</guid>
      <description>Assembly would be a huge set of 1x1 blocks. You could do everything other blocks could do, and more, but it took a lot of time and planning to put them all together the right way.C would be 1x1 with a few 2x1 and 4x1 thrown in for convenience.C++ would be just like C, but there would be all these new highly specific pieces which would only be used by a few people.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
